5 Comments
User's avatar
Michael Woudenberg's avatar

I enjoyed this. The looking ahead sound a lot like the Foresight / Threatcasting community.

Patrick Van Horne's avatar

Thanks Michael. I think there are two pieces with it: anticipating what future scenarios could be, and then orgs readying themselves for them.

I think sometimes we expect too much certainty out of the intelligence/forecasting/foresight functions before orgs make the decision to do anything about it.

But by the time you have certainty, it’s often too late to do anything about it. The goal is to get enough clarity to start acting.

Appreciate the share.

Michael Woudenberg's avatar

Yeah, the certainty element drives with nuts with Futures because it’s more pattern recognition and adaptation. Certainty is why we keep failing.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Apr 14
Comment deleted
Kyle Shepard's avatar

I’ve learned to become more of a listener due to time constraints for uninterrupted reading. That being said, I still prefer reading and always value your feedback brother 👊🏻

Patrick Van Horne's avatar

Baird - I'd rather write instead of speak, so thanks for digging into the articles!

Both models (left of bang or right of bang) have their benefits and limitations, but not being clear on which one you've chosen, whether that matches the expectations of the community or customers, and how those decisions impact the way a person leads their team, is often where organizations run into situations where they look confused and disjointed.

Yet, it doesn't have to be that way either.